Home of the Free, Online eBook:
The Detection of Ether

The Purpose of this Website

In my many years of research I have learned the hard way that "establishments" are interested in the perpetuation of their establishment, not in finding truth. To them the purpose of research is not to find truth, but rather to increase their power and prestige.

This mentality permeates mathematics, physics, biology, microbiology, etc.

For example, in physics, the physics "establishment" is not interested in data or in causality, all they are interested in is their public status of being the "defenders of Einstein." Thus, when someone outside of the establishment disproves something Einstein said, the establishment ignores them.

In other words, once human beings get into power, their focus is on maintaining that power, not on finding any truth, especially by an "outsider."

Thus, people like Roland DeWitte, and many others, who love truth, but who are not inside the establishment, are "left out in the cold," even if they are the ones who design and execute experiments which contradict established doctrine.

It is not the rejection of the scientists, which is the problem, it is the rejection of truth that is the problem. They reject the scientist because they are not inside the "box," but in the process they reject the truth that that person discovered.

Since people outside the establishment cannot get published in "establishment" controlled journals, they have to report the results of their experiments on obscure websites.

Thus, if you wish to know the truth about many things, truth which you will never hear outside of the Internet, then you need to read websites such as this one.

Theoretical Physics

Had the physics community followed Tesla instead of Einstein, physics (and the world we live in) would be quite different today. However, since people who are driven by money and power, hate truth (in this case it started with businessmen, then the media, then the physics establishment caved into the pressure), it was inevitable that Tesla would end up being deleted from the physics books (except for a measurement of magnetism being named after him, which was given by electrical engineers, not physicists).

This website is the official website of the eBook: "The Detection of Ether." Links to the book are found below.

Prior to reading the book you might be interested to read the section below: "A Message To Young Physicists."

Theoretical Mathematics

Hilbert's First Problem, which is related to the Continuum Hypothesis, is considered to be solved. Hogwash.

Cardinality is a concept of the "size" of sets - period. The Continuum Hypothesis is about the "size" of R versus the "size" of N. The Continuum Hypothesis itself assumes R is uncountable. It does not ask the questsion as to whether R is countable, it asks the question: Is there some set which has a "size" between R and N.

It turns out that R and N are the same size. In other words, R is countable. Sorry, but that is the truth. The basic assumption of the Continuum Hypothesis is false, thus the CH asks a moot question, thus the CH has been solved. If a person finds a false assumption in a theorem, then the theorem is "solved."

Because no one wants to know that R is countable, numerous mathematics journals have refused to review any of my 8 or 10 major papers on this subject (I have written more than 400 pages of journal articles on transfinite set theory, but no journal has reviewed a single one of them.).

See the article: "A Message To PhDs in Set Theory (Mathematics)," below, after reading my eBook.

This free eBook contains the proof that R is countable:
Hinged Sets and the Answer to the Continuum Hypothesis
Addendum on Turing Machines

Biology and Microbiology

Obviously, biologists and microbiologists officially push the theory of evolution (though not all individuals do). But that is not my only complaint about these scientists. In addition to pushing evolution, they also ignore the many discoveries of alternative cancer treatment researchers who have discovered the full nature of pleomorphic microbes. Microbiologists are not interested in looking through a microscope to watch microbes morph.

The theory of evolution is both scientific nonsense and mathematical nonsense. However, the theory pays well in monetary terms, so scientists are anxious to support it (or should I say that their money-hungry universities force them to push it).

Since the discovery of DNA, the theory of evolution has become so ridiculous that it is mind-boggling. However, the evolution movement, which is largely led by atheists who have a lot of money, continues to claim that evolution is a "proven fact of science."

I am currently writing a book on the absurdity of the theory of evolution, so I won't say anything more about it on this website. I can't tell you the name of the book because the names of books are frequently determined by publishers and I don't have a publisher yet (thus, I don't know the title myself).

Research in Medicine

Researchers got a black eye when it was learned that more than 1,500 "scientific" studies had been carefully designed, executed and published, to "prove" that tobacco did not cause lung cancer or heart disease. These studies were funded by the defunct Council for Tobacco Research (CTR) and in order to get a portion of their $220 million dollars in "research" money a person had to carefully design a study which sounded like it was looking for a link between tobacco and lung cancer, but it was not actually allowed to find a link.

The Council For Tobacco Research started the prostitution of "science," and medical researchers in particular.

Since the CTR was shut down, and even long before it was shut down, medical "researchers" also sold their integrity to the pharmaceutical industry. The word "whore" should be redefined.

The pharmaceutical industry totally controls all medical research money in the world. While many fine people are medical researchers, as an industry medical researchers have again prostituted themselves for the almighty dollar.

For example, there are more than 300 "alternative" (i.e. non-pharmaceutical) cures for cancer. Some of these treatments are much stronger than others, but all of them will cure some cases of cancer.

All of these are rejected by the pharmaceutical industry and the totally rotten Food and Drug Administration (FDA), in favor of "drugs" which are useless, but are very profitable and can be patented (i.e. monopolistic prices can be used).

See this website for a small peephole into this cesspool of humanity:
www.natural-treatment.info

Science and Religion

There are many young scientists who have been taught to believe that evolution is a scientific fact and that all true scientists should be atheists. While this may be the current state of affairs, it is just so much nonsense.

If you were walking in the woods and suddently came over a hill and saw a brand new Cadillac which had its engine running and its lights on, you would know that the trees were made by Mother Nature, but the Cadillac was made by human beings.

Now suppose someone looks at a composite photograph of the Universe, and sees the billions of complex galaxies, floating in open space. What would they think? Would they think the Universe was created by chance? If so, then they have fallen victim to severe brainwashing.

Such a thought would be a million times more ludicrous than thinking that a Cadillac was made by a series of accidents of mud eroding over millions of years.

The Universe was created by a Supreme Intelligence. It was created by design. Likewise, our DNA was created by the same Supreme Intelligence, otherwise known as God.

Do not be deceived in this area. Do not allow yourself to be brainwashed and deceived by ambitious "scientists" and judges.

A Message To Young Physicists

The key issue of this website is the subject of "ether," also spelled "aether," a substance which fills the Universe, which Einstein himself said had to exist in order for his General Theory of Relativity to work. However, the "ether" of Einstein and the "ether" of Tesla and Michelson were quite different.

Let me start this discussion with an example.

As part of Einstein's Special Theory of Relativity there is a claim that there is no Universal Reference Frame (URF). Indeed, the entire purpose of the concept of "relative" reference frames was to do away with the concept of a "universal" reference frame.

In my book I will explain what a "sidereal day period" is, but once you understand what it is, you will understand that Einstein's theory (that there is no URF) is basically a theory that no experiment will ever result in data with a "sidereal day period."

In 1991 an engineer named Roland De Witte, who lived in Belgium, did a 178 day experiment using 6 atomic clocks, 6 digital phase comparators, etc. During this entire experiment he continuously detected a "sidereal day period."

Roland was excited because he had detected that there was a Universal Reference Frame. He submitted several papers to scientific journals and was rejected every time. He could not even get published in Belgium.

At this point we must pause and reflect. Let us separate in our minds De Witte's DATA and De Witte's INTERPRETATION of his DATA. De Witte's DATA was sufficient to obviously disproved one of Einstein's cherished theories. His DATA was sufficient to prove to any physicist two things:
1) There is a Universal Reference Frame and
2) Einstein was wrong.

Journals should have been excited to publish his DATA, with a disclaimer that they did not agree with his INTERPRETATION of his DATA. But they didn't. Nor has anyone attempted to replicate his data.

Scientists should also have been excited about his DATA because with proper design, his techniques could be used, using many carefully designed experiments at different angles (relative to the constellation Leo), to determine whether our Universe is rotating. Scientists couldn't care less about such a discovery. They are not interested in passively or pro-actively finding the truth.

Furthermore, knowledge that our Universe is rotating would destroy another cherished theory - the Big Bang Theory. The only thing scientists want to do is protect their popular theories, especially the ones of Einstein and also the ones that "support" that humans are the most intelligent creatures in the Universe (i.e. atheism).

Because the DATA of his experiments would lead any scientist on earth to know Einstein was wrong, the scientific journals rejected De Witte's paper.

When a self-proclaimed "physicist" rejects DATA because the DATA leads to unpopular conclusions (i.e. that Einstein was wrong), someone should take away their PhD, cut it up, then burn it. But because such people comprise the vast majority, it will never happen.

A person has no right to call himself or herself a "physicist" that rejects DATA that can be verified and replicated. Such people transform "physics" into "religion."

The physicists of this generation are absolutely no different than the ones in the days of Copernicus or Galileo. It seems that in all "establishments" mediocre people not only gain control (because they are always in the vast majority), they persecute those with talent. Nicola Tesla is the best example of this in the history of physics.

The free book on this website: The Detection of Ether, is yet another case in a growing list of cases like that of Roland De Witte. I did a major experiment at Sprint Corporation which disproved two more of Einstein's theories. The DATA of my experiments is verifiable and can be replicated. In fact, my DATA can be replicated by any high school physics class with $200 to spend and access to their school over the weekend (it requires a 24 hour long experiment).

I wrote a major paper describing my experiment and my DATA. Five major physics journals sent me emails telling me not to even submit my paper to their journal. They weren't interested in evaluating a paper that had DATA that conflicted with Einstein's theories.

I truly feel sorry for young physicists. There is no hope they will ever be unchained from the absurdity of three of Einstein's key theories (the photon theory, Special Relativity [including the URF] and General Relativity). They will spend their entire careers studying totally absurd theories of gravity, studying particles that don't exist, and so on.

If a young physicist does discover some great truth, it will be crushed if their DATA contradicts the Religion of Einstein.

The process by which a person gets a PhD in physics is not a process devoted to open-mindedness and creativity, it is a process to whip the person into conformity and brainwash them into mindless obedience.

My aunt, Helen Kehr Billings, who herself had a PhD, use to tell me:

• "When they give a person a Bachelors degree, they take away their mouth, when they give them a Masters degree, they take away their brains, and when they give them a PhD, they give them back their mouth."
  Helen Kehr Billings, PhD (1901-1995)

I have never found any statement to be more literally true.

For most young physicists the current state of affairs is not a problem because they too are more interested in prestige than truth. But for the small percentage of people who love truth, it is just a matter of time until they find the truth that many others have already found. They will then have to start talking to the "renegades," because the establishment will have castigated them. They will be branded as a "renegade" because they don't "follow the program."

Such is the world we live in, a world where "truth" is hated and popularity, prestige and money are loved. I have seen this same pattern in physics, theoretical mathematics, biology (multiple times), medicine (many times), politics and religion. In fact the love of money, power, prestige and pleasure, and the hatred of truth, is literally one of the "defining characteristics" of many of those who live on this planet. It is these kinds of people who seek for power, and obtain it.

From the Dilbert comic strip:

• Dilbert to Dogbert: "My invention will turn people into mindless sheep."
  Dogbert to Dilbert: "I'm curious how you'll know it works. I assume it's mostly a cosmetic change."
  Scott Adams, Dilbert, 2002

Click to See the Cartoon

Note: Roland De Witte's original website no longer exists, but I have mirrored it on this website and the link to it is below.

R. Webster Kehr

The Book: "The Detection of Ether"
in Adobe Acrobat 'pdf' format

The Book: "The Detection of Ether"
in HTML Format

A Message To PhDs in Set Theory (Mathematics)

For over 30 years I have pondered the Continuum Hypothesis, ever since graduating from college in mathematics in 1972. I know more about the Continuum Hypothesis than any other mathematician on earth - by a very wide margin.

When I was first shown the Diagonalization Theorem when I was in college, my first reaction was: "This proof is nothing but a game of keep away, it is not a proof." Within a year I was convinced R is countable.

During the last 10 years I have written over 300 pages of technical articles on the Continuum Hypothesis. These 300 pages, representing about a dozen articles, include more than 100 major discoveries in Set Theory.

Two of my mathematics articles are linked to above, however, both of these articles are old and outdated, but they are worth your time to look at.

During the last 10 years I have tried on several occasions to get my articles published. To date not a single journal has even looked at one of my articles. One German journal claimed it was reviewed, but the 2 page review did not even mention a single concept in my paper. I mentioned this to the editor, but he refused to have anyone else review it.

My most current paper on the Continuum Hypothesis is about 35 pages long and has a proof in it that is irrefutable. It is not on this web site due to copyright reasons.

If you are a PhD in mathematics, and Set Theory is one of your specialties, and you would like to read my newest paper, not only will you be pleasantly surprised by its first two proofs, but I may have another surprise for you.

R. Webster Kehr
B.S. Mathematics, 1972

Physics, Mathematics, and Other Links