Home of the Free, Online eBook:
The Detection of Ether

About This Website

Did you know that there are many physicists who consider Nichola Tesla to be the greatest scientific genius since Sir Isaac Newton?

Tesla believed light was a wave through a medium called: aether or ether. Einstein believed light was a particle. Everyone knows light has both wave and particle properties, so what is light?

In 1925 the first American Nobel Prize winner in physics, Albert Michelson, proved that light is a wave.

In 1990-1991 I did a series of experiments while at the Sprint Corporation which proved that light did not follow the laws of celestial mechanics on the surface of the earth.

Both Michelson and myself, using vastly different experimental techniques, proved that there is a "balloon" of ether which is entrained to the earth. This "balloon," called "ether drag," is the only way to explain the data in our experiments. In other words, the laws of celestial mechanics should apply to what goes on on the surface of this earth, but they don't!!

Did you know that Einstein's 1920 version of special relativity is nothing but a mathematical model of "ether drag?"

Let us change the subject and talk about the theory of evolution. Did you know that there are many people who consider the theory of evolution to be scientific nonsense? Do you know why?

The reason is that there are many problems with the theory of evolution:
1) Evolution is riddled with assumptions, not facts,
2) A great deal of data which challenges evolution is ignored,
3) Credit is given for evolution where in fact there is no evidence for giving this credit, and
4) Evolution seems to be nothing but wishful thinking by people who wish the theory of evolution was true.

Physics and evolution are just two examples where there are many people who think "outside the box."

In the media and in school, students are taught to ridicule people who think "outside the box." You are not taught that there are many very intelligent people who disagree with many of the things you are taught in school. While you may think you understand why they are "outside the box," and why these "crackpots" should be ignored, in reality you probably don't have a clue what they think, and more importantly, why they disagree with the things you are taught.

Would you like to what is really going on "outside the box" in three different fields of science and mathematics? If so, this is the website for you.

This website will discuss three very diverse topics:
1) Theoretical physics (nature of light, special theory of relativity),
2) Theoretical mathematics (i.e. transfinite set theory), and
3) The theory of evolution.

Two free eBooks are on this website, one on the subject of physics and one on transfinite set theory (i.e. mathematics).

The other topic (evolution) will be briefly discussed on this website, but the main information is linked to on another website.

1) About the free Physics eBook: The Detection of Ether

Back in 2001 I was working for the Sprint Corporation. Sprint, as you may know, is a fiber optics communications company. We had a technical problem in fiber optics called "wander and jitter."

I came up with a theory as to what caused "wander and jitter" and then proposed an experiment to prove I was right. I gave a presentation to Sprint's Chief Scientist and offered two theories which my experiments were designed to prove or disprove. After listening to me for two hours, he was impressed but did not offer any financial help for my experiments.

Several months later I received an email from Roland De Witte of Belgium. Roland had done a 178-day experiment at Belgacom and had proven one of my two theories was true while doing his research in Belgium (he did not know me at the time)!!

I forwarded De Witte's email to Sprint's Chief Scientist and two days later I received a phone call from the Chief Scientist's department asking me one question: "How much do you want?"

The book on this website is a result of the theoretical discoveries made during those experiments. It turns out that one of my theories was wrong, but in the process of proving myself wrong, I made two massive discoveries in theoretical physics.

The experiments at Sprint Corporation, which can now be easily replicated by any high school physics class with today's advances in inexpensive laser technology, proved conclusively that light is a wave.

Of course, if light is a wave, there must be a "medium" for light to vibrate. That medium is "ether," which is commonly spelled "aether," a substance which fills the Universe.

Nikola Tesla was a big supporter of ether. Much of Tesla's research assumed the existence of ether.

Einstein, on the other hand, was a big proponent that light was a particle, called photons.

What my experiments proved was that light, on the surface of this earth, does not obey the laws of celestial mechanics!! In other words, what I proved is that there is some kind of "balloon" which travels with our earth as our solar system travels towards the constellation Leo. Remember, any high school or college physics class can replicate my experiment for less than $100.

But if there is a balloon which "holds" light, then the particle theory of light must be wrong and the ether theory of light must be right. Not only that, but "ether drag" was also detected by Nobel Prize winner Albert Michelson in 1925. Michelson was ignored because 2 or 3 years earlier Einstein had been deified by the media. Most likely Einstein had been deified by the media because Tesla was close to perfecting a way to create "free energy" and the energy companies and banks were not happy about that.

But if "ether drag" exists, then ether exists. Tesla Physics was correct!!

The physics book also provides a far more elegant explanation for Einstein's Special Theory of Relativity than has previously existed. In fact, Einstein's 1920 version of the Special Theory of Relativity is really nothing but a mathematical model of ether drag!!! Ether actually provides the causality to explain why Einstein's 1920 version of relativity is mathematically correct!! Without ether, there is no causality for Einstein's special relativity.

Note: Roland De Witte's original website, which discussed his magnificent experiments, no longer exists, but I have mirrored it on this website.
Roland De Witte - Roland DeWitte - Website (Mirror: Original site has been shut down)

Here are links to other websites which discuss ether and/or Tesla.
Ether Links
Nikola Tesla Links

2) About the free Mathematics eBook:
Hinged Sets and the Answer to the Continuum Hypothesis

Cardinality, in theoretical mathematics, is a concept of the "size" of sets. The Continuum Hypothesis is about the "size" of R (the real numbers between 0 and 1) versus the "size" of N (the natural numbers).

The Continuum Hypothesis itself assumes R is uncountable. It does not ask the question as to whether R is countable, rather it asks the question: Is there some set which has a "size" between R and N.

It turns out that the proof that R is larger than N is flawed. A counterexample to the proof that R is uncountable is given in the eBook. I essentially design a special set which is known to be countable, and then using the technology of diagonalization prove the set is uncountable.

It turns out that R and N are the same size. There are two proofs in the eBook that R and N are the same size.

This free eBook contains the proofs that R is countable:
Hinged Sets and the Answer to the Continuum Hypothesis
Addendum on Turing Machines

3) The Theory of Evolution

There are many young scientists who have been taught to believe that evolution is a scientific fact and that all true scientists should be evolutionists. While this may be the current state of affairs, it turns out that the theory of evolution is mathematical nonsense.

If you were walking in the woods and suddenly came over a hill and saw a brand new Cadillac which had its engine running and its lights on and its flashers blinking, you would know that the trees were made by Mother Nature, but the Cadillac was made by General Motors.

Prior to the discovery of DNA, the theory of evolution was not living up to its hype. To be specific, the gradualism predicted by Darwin failed to be discovered and the transitional species were more a figment of people's imagination than something paleontologists had found.

According to the book: Darwin's Enigma, the theory of evolution was dying a slow death.

With the discovery of DNA, in 1953, there should have been a massive shift in emphasis to a mathematical analysis as to whether natural selection and random mutations of nucleotides could have created millions of unique species.

In fact, in 1966 at the Wistar Symposium, evolutionists and non-evolutionists agreed the probability of the theory of evolution was nonsense. And this was back in the days when only 2.5% of human DNA was considered to be important!!

Now scientists know that over 50% of human DNA is important, and anyone who can see a trend will conclude that probably all of human DNA has a purpose.

Scientists today, instead of looking at the mathematics of DNA (i.e. evolution) still use nineteenth century morphology and homology to "prove" the theory of evolution.

The reason is obvious, there are too many skeletons in the closet to talk about mathematics and evolution.

Evolution today is given credit for all discoveries in biology and genetics. However, there is no proof for one shred of the claims.

In the two books I have written, I demonstrate that the problems with the theory of evolution go much deeper than simple probability. Several new concepts in the analysis of how evolution had to have happened render the theory of evolution as mathematically impossible.

Here are links to two free, online eBooks on why the theory of evolution cannot be true:
Introduction to the Mathematics of Evolution (Free Book for the General Public)
Prophets or Evolution - An LDS Perspective (Same Book Plus Additional Chapters for LDS)

About R. Webster Kehr

Here is a brief biography of myself (and my email address):
About R. Webster Kehr